| Author |
Message |
|
|
|
Fri Aug 31, 2012 8:29 am  |
| Is anyone using both of these devices? If so can you tell me the difference and what you think are the pros and cons of each? Is Galvanic better for cleaning rather than toning whereas Microcurrent is better at toning. From my research that is what I gathered but would love to hear from others who have used both. Thanks! |
|
|
johnsongini
New Member
 
Joined: 03 Jan 2018
Posts: 1
|
|
|
Wed Jan 03, 2018 7:28 am |
| I have used the NuSkin Galvanic Spa since it was introduced. I have used it in conjunction with the FaceMaster, and I was pleased with the results. The downside was the time it took. The FaceMaster, which I have used for 18 years, takes 25 minutes and you must use special end caps and conductive solution. Too much time! The NuSkin spa takes about 10 minutes, but it's messy, and you have to rinse in-between 1st and 2nd mode, and the conductive gel is thick and has to be thinned with a hyaluronic spray. I have just started using NuFace. It takes far less time and isn't messy! I don't have to rinse. I think it is better for toning, and for special events, I FOLLOW it with the NuSkin spa. The results are great! And I interchange the conductive solutions and sprays. |
|
|
|
|
|
Sun Feb 11, 2018 6:56 am |
I am a happy NuFace user 
Microcurrents and galvanic are different technologies, difference is in both current strength and impulse shape.
In terms of effect, galvanic is stimulating muscles to contract and like that influences muscles and microcurrents stimulate ATP production, that leads to more collagen and elastin over time and also stimulates muscles. So, both help facial muscles, but microcurrent ones help skin too
I found galvanic devices harder to use because one needs to apply the probes to the right points (at least that was my problem with gadgets I tried) and with microcurrent you sort of glide following instructions from the manufacturer (there are also microcurrent devices where you need to hit the right spots). |
|
|
|
|
|
Sun Mar 25, 2018 1:16 pm |
Hi!
Has anyone tried the ZIIP Beauty by Melani Simon?
Or even better tried both the ZIIP and NuFace?
Any preferences?
If so why?
How are the long-term effects?
Any negative ones or only good?
Thanks for any feedback you might have! |
_________________
“When you do things from your soul, you feel a river moving in you, a joy.” Rumi |
|
Erlin
New Member
Joined: 28 Nov 2018
Posts: 1
|
|
|
Thu Nov 29, 2018 10:18 pm |
my trinity gold is on its way...
but, few of my friends uses galvanic spa instead of trinity. I don't know whether its because we can't get nuface easily here in Indonesia or what. anyway, is there anyone have some idea of which one better between galvanic spa and trinity? |
|
|
pallavi_gupta
New Member
Joined: 05 Dec 2018
Posts: 5
|
|
|
Tue Jan 08, 2019 4:00 am |
| A: Both the NuFACE mini and NuFACE Trinity deliver a low-level electrical current (microcurrent), which stimulates the skin to improve its appearance. ... NuFACE mini is a microcurrent-only device that is petite, portable and yet has the same power as the NuFACE Trinity. |
|
|
|
|
| Thu Apr 18, 2024 11:05 am |
If this is your first visit to the EDS Forums please take the time to register. Registration is required for you to post on the forums. Registration will also give you the ability to track messages of interest, send private messages to other users, participate in Gift Certificates draws and enjoy automatic discounts for shopping at our online store. Registration is free and takes just a few seconds to complete.
Click Here to join our community.
If you are already a registered member on the forums, please login to gain full access to the site. |
|
 |
|
