| Author |
Message |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mon Jan 13, 2014 5:43 pm  |
How so clumsy of L'Oreal! I am actually mad they did this. Probably hoped to boost sales by showing off their ad after a beloved actress just left the stage. Someone clearly forgot that false advertising does not get the thumbs up. Oh how phony this makes their claims about their product look! I am actually ashamed for them. IMO they are the losers here. Hope Diane is still getting paid for her part in the ad....
Wasn't L'Oreal the same company that "whitewashed" Beyonce so she would look a few shades lighter than her true color? Why all the bull****? You would think there were a shortage of models to fit the images they are trying to portray. Argh!
They coulda used a different model who still looks the same now to continue lying about their products for the Globes ad. #Fail |
|
|
|
|
 |
Mon Jan 13, 2014 6:34 pm |
Boo on L'Oreal 
I wish I could get at Diane with a Dermapen, exercises, diet, supps and some decent products! |
_________________
✪ My go-to products: MyFawnie.BigCartel.com ✪ |
|
|
|
|
Mon Jan 13, 2014 6:47 pm |
| The only thing I find disturbing (or disappointing) is that Diane Keaton would allow L'Oreal to photoshop her so blatantly. I would not have expected that of her. Just goes to show you never know to what degree anything is falsified in advertising. |
_________________
Enjoying dermalogica with my ASG and Pico toner ** Disclosure: I was a participant without remuneration in promotional videos for Ageless Secret Gold and the Neurotris Pico Emmy event. |
|
|
|
|
Mon Jan 13, 2014 6:58 pm |
| Whoa - that was really stupid of L'Oreal. |
_________________
Esthetician working at a Med-spa. Love the Clarisonic! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mon Jan 13, 2014 8:30 pm |
Sure, there are noninvasive procedures to plump up the skin *cough*ASG*cough*  but she has way more damage than any of that could completely erase.
Im surprised no one has ever approached her about teeth whitening! or better denture cleanser. |
_________________
✪ My go-to products: MyFawnie.BigCartel.com ✪ |
|
|
|
|
Tue Jan 14, 2014 7:53 am |
| fawnie wrote: |
Boo on L'Oreal
I wish I could get at Diane with a Dermapen, exercises, diet, supps and some decent products! |
lol |
_________________
We shall not cease from exploration, and the end of all our exploring will be to arrive where we started and know the place for the first time. |
|
|
|
|
Tue Jan 14, 2014 9:16 am |
I don't think she would allow it, but bet she probably signed a contract and they had fine print in saying they could do what they wanted. Many times stars are just considered products for these cosmetic companies.
| sister sweets wrote: |
| The only thing I find disturbing (or disappointing) is that Diane Keaton would allow L'Oreal to photoshop her so blatantly. I would not have expected that of her. Just goes to show you never know to what degree anything is falsified in advertising. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tue Jan 14, 2014 11:59 am |
I'm not sure why but your link only links me back to your post. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tue Jan 14, 2014 12:32 pm |
| I think something's wacky with the links feature of EDS today. All my links just lead back to another EDS post. |
_________________
✪ My go-to products: MyFawnie.BigCartel.com ✪ |
|
|
|
|
Tue Jan 14, 2014 12:39 pm |
all these companies are full of crap, and I'm not buying into it.
I don't think it's a coincidence that none of the skin or hair care products I use air any commercials or hire spokesmodels. In fact, as soon as a company hires a "famous face" to hawk its beauty wares, that is when they tank in my eyes. |
|
|
|
|
|
Tue Jan 14, 2014 1:31 pm |
| fawnie wrote: |
| I think something's wacky with the links feature of EDS today. All my links just lead back to another EDS post. |
I have found that if you do not surround the link string with the [URL] codes, the link may not always work right on this forum. It happened to me before when I simply typed out a link I knew by heart and it redirected to "Page Not Found". |
|
|
|
|
|
Tue Jan 14, 2014 2:10 pm |
| TheresaMary wrote: |
I don't think she would allow it, but bet she probably signed a contract and they had fine print in saying they could do what they wanted. Many times stars are just considered products for these cosmetic companies.
| sister sweets wrote: |
| The only thing I find disturbing (or disappointing) is that Diane Keaton would allow L'Oreal to photoshop her so blatantly. I would not have expected that of her. Just goes to show you never know to what degree anything is falsified in advertising. |
|
I think most 'stars' like to be photoshopped. I just never expected Diane Keaton to be one of them.
Of course she signed a contract and I suppose in doing so she knew she would be photoshopped. I don't think she missed any fine print. I just had higher expectations of her. |
_________________
Enjoying dermalogica with my ASG and Pico toner ** Disclosure: I was a participant without remuneration in promotional videos for Ageless Secret Gold and the Neurotris Pico Emmy event. |
|
|
|
|
Tue Jan 14, 2014 2:12 pm |
| bellabambiiina wrote: |
all these companies are full of crap, and I'm not buying into it.
I don't think it's a coincidence that none of the skin or hair care products I use air any commercials or hire spokesmodels. In fact, as soon as a company hires a "famous face" to hawk its beauty wares, that is when they tank in my eyes. |
Good point. Come to think of it, the products I use don't have commercials or spokesmodels either. I prefer it that way. |
_________________
Enjoying dermalogica with my ASG and Pico toner ** Disclosure: I was a participant without remuneration in promotional videos for Ageless Secret Gold and the Neurotris Pico Emmy event. |
|
|
|
|
Tue Jan 14, 2014 4:41 pm |
What ads could do is, in very tiny print at the bottom, print a disclaimer "Your results may not be the same" or "For entertainment purposes only."  |
|
|
|
|
|
Tue Jan 14, 2014 8:39 pm |
| bellabambiiina wrote: |
all these companies are full of crap, and I'm not buying into it.
I don't think it's a coincidence that none of the skin or hair care products I use air any commercials or hire spokesmodels. In fact, as soon as a company hires a "famous face" to hawk its beauty wares, that is when they tank in my eyes. |
I agree!This is how I feel too! |
|
|
|
|
|
Wed Jan 15, 2014 1:50 am |
| I think even when they use young models, they are photoshopped - it is just more apparent when they do it to an older model! On the positive side, these days they are at least using older models/actresses and giving them work! I doubt anybody believes any photos these days - we are all much too wise. I mostly ignore all their advertising and just buy a product if I read regular good reviews from users. |
|
|
|
|
|
Wed Jan 15, 2014 7:04 am |
I'm sure most stars do, but I wouldn't think Diane Keaton is one of them, and would willingly allow herself to be made a mockery of herself - which lets face it this campaign does just that.
Like any contracts, there are often hidden extras included in the fine print, but I doubt that she would knowingly have signed it if she knew that photoshopping was going to be included. lets hope in one of her upcoming interviews they ask her that and then we can put our minds to ease before we throw the baby out with the bathwater.
| sister sweets wrote: |
| TheresaMary wrote: |
I don't think she would allow it, but bet she probably signed a contract and they had fine print in saying they could do what they wanted. Many times stars are just considered products for these cosmetic companies.
| sister sweets wrote: |
| The only thing I find disturbing (or disappointing) is that Diane Keaton would allow L'Oreal to photoshop her so blatantly. I would not have expected that of her. Just goes to show you never know to what degree anything is falsified in advertising. |
|
I think most 'stars' like to be photoshopped. I just never expected Diane Keaton to be one of them.
Of course she signed a contract and I suppose in doing so she knew she would be photoshopped. I don't think she missed any fine print. I just had higher expectations of her. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wed Jan 15, 2014 10:01 am |
How come no one has answered why she looks so much younger on Ellen April 2013 than she did in 2007? I find it odd that on a forum that swears gadgets can pick up the face so it looks good before an event, that no one thinks she could actually commit to such a regimen when she is making movies or promoting them.
In this video taken the same year https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jwo2qtgkxis&feature=youtube_gdata_player, she does not look old and wrinkly...so either she gets cosmetic procedures which she is not keeping up with at the moment, or her makeup artist's skills are as good as those of Ellen's because lovely Ellen looks very different without makeup http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-2357877/CoverGirl-brand-ambassador-Ellen-DeGeneres-reveals-whats-make-steps-barefaced-furniture-shopping.html (Of course the messy paps tried to catch her making the ugliest faces to exaggerat the difference  ). So IMO, it is more than Photoshop. I reckon she does something to tighten her face, esp neck and jaw for special appearances because in the vid I posted upthread of her on the Ellen Show she did not look like she had an accordion neck/jaw or wrinkly skin.
So maybe for the Globe Awards she forewent layers of makeup and any facials/work she normally gets. *shrug* |
|
|
|
|
|
Wed Jan 15, 2014 10:06 am |
| Google "face lift tape". Instantly youthenizing! |
_________________
✪ My go-to products: MyFawnie.BigCartel.com ✪ |
|
|
|
|
Wed Jan 15, 2014 10:16 am |
| fawnie wrote: |
| Google "face lift tape". Instantly youthenizing! |
Exactly my point! Everyone is clutching pearls at the horror that Diane Keaton had the audacity to allow extreme Photoshop to be done on her when really she may have had just the bare minimal done just like it is done on young models, only she already looked pretty good because she had something ELSE done to make her look younger IRL beforehand.
IOW, Diane didn't show up to film for the ad looking as she did at the Globe Awards. She had gotten "a lift by whatever means" so she looked younger than usual and then she had the ad made. Plus this was 7 years ago, which IMO is enough time for someone who isn't doing anything to fight aging to age and look different, especially if the makeup application happens to be also different. *shrug* |
|
|
|
|
|
Wed Jan 15, 2014 11:43 am |
If L'Oreal is still using photos and footage shot seven years ago, that would go a long way toward explaining the discrepancy in her appearance. In middle age, more so than in one's twenties or thirties, there is a more rapid decline in looks due to lack of hormones.
I'm sure Diane likes looking good professionally but can't be bothered to do it herself. Her choice. |
|
|
|
|
|
Thu Jan 16, 2014 7:01 am |
Jane Fonda is more or less, 9 years older than Diane Keaton. She is now 76.
Check out janefonda.com for current candids. I think she looks amazing.
I also think Diane Keaton looks amazing - at the awards show and in ads.
Both of these women (with the means and resources to do whatever they want) appear to be happy with who they are.
Everyone should be so lucky.
BFG |
_________________
Not Affiliated with any products or gadgets, encourage other posters here to state their affiliations in their signature line |
|
|
|
| Fri Apr 26, 2024 2:29 pm |
If this is your first visit to the EDS Forums please take the time to register. Registration is required for you to post on the forums. Registration will also give you the ability to track messages of interest, send private messages to other users, participate in Gift Certificates draws and enjoy automatic discounts for shopping at our online store. Registration is free and takes just a few seconds to complete.
Click Here to join our community.
If you are already a registered member on the forums, please login to gain full access to the site. |
|
 |
|
