| Author |
Message |
|
|
|
Wed Jan 09, 2008 9:06 pm  |
| my skin texture has improved since i started using this last week!! i cant wait to see how it'll look in a few weeks |
|
|
|
|
|
Wed Jan 09, 2008 9:36 pm |
| I'm with BBD. I just returned mine yesterday. I used it for almost a month trying both the normal and the sensitive brushes but my acne just got worse and worse. Also, my skin became even oilier than usual which I didn't think was possible. It did make my skin feel very clean and soft however I couldn't deal with the constant breakouts. |
|
|
|
|
|
Wed Jan 09, 2008 9:47 pm |
| This looks like a really neat product. Where did you all buy yours? Does EDS carry it? |
_________________
mid 30's with first fine lines, a few sun spots, hormonal chin acne and some acne scars |
|
|
|
|
Wed Jan 09, 2008 9:51 pm |
| Yes EDS does carry it and they honor the manufacturer's 60 day guarantee. |
|
|
|
|
|
Wed Jan 09, 2008 10:00 pm |
| doodles wrote: |
| Yes EDS does carry it and they honor the manufacturer's 60 day guarantee. |
Thanks Doodles and sorry for the newbie question - should have looked myself.  |
_________________
mid 30's with first fine lines, a few sun spots, hormonal chin acne and some acne scars |
|
|
|
|
Thu Jan 10, 2008 6:40 am |
| The ad for the Neutrogena face brush/cleanser mentioned that it increases collagen in the skin. The ad cited studies to indicate that claim. The Neutrogena version also claims the other skin improvements that Clarisonic does (better tone, smaller pores, etc.) Clarisonic doesn't claim to incite collagen induction, so I'm interested in the far less expensive Neutrogena. The Neutrogena isn't exactly the same as the Clarisonic---cleans by a different mechanism, but if it does more for the skin than the Clarisonic, and it's less pricey, why not?! Has anyone here tried it? |
|
|
|
|
|
Thu Jan 10, 2008 6:16 pm |
| MBGirl wrote: |
| The ad for the Neutrogena face brush/cleanser mentioned that it increases collagen in the skin. The ad cited studies to indicate that claim. The Neutrogena version also claims the other skin improvements that Clarisonic does (better tone, smaller pores, etc.) Clarisonic doesn't claim to incite collagen induction, so I'm interested in the far less expensive Neutrogena. The Neutrogena isn't exactly the same as the Clarisonic---cleans by a different mechanism, but if it does more for the skin than the Clarisonic, and it's less pricey, why not?! Has anyone here tried it? |
If I remember correctly, Neutrogena, ROC and all the other ones is not in a brush form, but a sponge.
Clarsonic does not rotate, it just vibrates a bit so that your skin is not being pulled. |
|
|
|
|
|
Fri Jan 11, 2008 8:35 am |
| Yes, I realize that the Clarisonic and Neutrogena work via different mechanisms, but if the Neutrogena does more (i.e. cause an induction of collagen) I am inclined to try the much less expensive Neutrogena. I'm curious about how the Neutrogena causes new collagen formation, though. |
|
|
|
|
| Wed Nov 26, 2025 4:41 pm |
If this is your first visit to the EDS Forums please take the time to register. Registration is required for you to post on the forums. Registration will also give you the ability to track messages of interest, send private messages to other users, participate in Gift Certificates draws and enjoy automatic discounts for shopping at our online store. Registration is free and takes just a few seconds to complete.
Click Here to join our community.
If you are already a registered member on the forums, please login to gain full access to the site. |
|
 |
|
