| Author |
Message |
|
|
 |
Fri Jun 22, 2012 4:47 am |
Thanks Nonie, I do think Carolyn is a very pretty woman for sure, and Eva too without doubt. Hell I even had sessions with Eva herself in her studio about 9 years ago and she was an absolute delight.
Which instructors do you not see defined jaws in out of curiousity? Almost all of the ones I look at have that very look (defined jawline). Even Tom Haggerty who is closest to Eva’s age and still very active on his own forum.
I suppose to me it’s the combination of factors of all of those things and not a single one of them, which when blended together creates an aged look. I mean Eva you’re right is in her 80’s and its by no means to discredit her, as I think she is an amazing woman and she is still very active nowadays for which I give her full credit for. Also looking at her site, there are now some instructors she’s trained to teach her system, and some of them look amazing to me! |
|
|
|
|
 |
Fri Jun 22, 2012 7:34 am |
I do not do one program, but have during the last 10 years sometimes tried different ones at different times for a lengthy period, and nowadays I do a combo of exercises that suit my face very well, borrowing from several. I still like and do things from Facial Magic, FlexEffect, Maggio's and Eva Frasers too plus other stuff. Which do I think looks best, well for me Cynthia Rowland is undoubtedly very feminine and pretty in my book, but I do also like Deb Crowely - her eyes are gorgeous. I like Eva Frasers mid face, but there are some parts which I dislike too. I don't think there are people who I would say look terrible because of facial exercisees. I even think Susan Denny looks very good too and she's in her 60's and I emailed her too.
| egyptiangoddess wrote: |
| TheresaMary, what facial exercise program do you do? And who do you think looks the best out of all of these women? |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Fri Jun 22, 2012 8:18 pm |
| You know, given the responses TheresaMary sent, I get the feeling that what would really be helpful are to see photos with no make-up. I am particularly super-curious to see what Carole Maggio and Cynthia Rowland look like without makeup, as they both seem to wear a lot. And Eva, too, if nothing else for inspiration! |
_________________ 34 y.o. FlexEffect and massage. Love experimenting with DIY and botanical skin care products. Appreciate both hard science and natural approaches. Eat green smoothies + lots of raw fruit and veggies. |
|
|
|
 |
Thu Aug 08, 2013 3:10 pm |
| Tom is awesome! I have cheek AND neck envy! |
|
|
|
|
 |
Thu Aug 08, 2013 3:10 pm |
| Thanks for posting the links Nonie; Tom and Carolyn look great |
|
|
|
|
 |
Thu Aug 08, 2013 3:57 pm |
Tom's eyes look much better than they used to...they had become way too almond shaped a few years ago, and looked like he had a bad eye job. And he does look very good for 81.
Carolyn looked pretty darn good too. |
_________________ No longer answering PM's due to numerous weird messages. |
|
|
|
 |
Fri Aug 09, 2013 5:28 am |
Wuchu facial detox technique system founder Master Tiong lastest photos taken July 2013
Master Tiong is 56 years young
The model is 51 years young
go the link
http://youtu.be/cfbGi9psiQE |
|
|
|
|
 |
Fri Aug 23, 2013 2:58 pm |
| Nonie aka AD wrote: |
| Deb Crowley wrote: |
| Nonie aka AD wrote: |
| TheresaMary wrote: |
Loulou posted this yesterday in the Ageless thread. For what its worth, I thought Deb looked pretty darn good in the photos she posted a few months back on the FlexEffect forum. Just went there now to see if I could repost but they have gone. But for what its worth, I think she looks fab and would much rather look like her than Maggio or any of the others:
| otherloulou wrote: |
Hi Theresa Mary, thanks for pointing people in the right direction for sales, and thank you also for your message letting me know that the recent pics that were on this thread have gone
I will try to post them again/put some more up in short order. As always, I do appreciate your attention to all things Ageless, because I would have had no idea about the photos if you hadn't told me.  |
|
Cool! Look forward to seeing Loulou's photos. Thanks for letting her know her pics went poof.
TheresaMary did you ever follow up with Deb w/r/t posting recent photos or even the video she said she was going to make without makeup over a year ago? Latest photos on her before/after page are from 2010 and I believe that is also when she last made a Youtube video! It would be nice to see the recent photos you said were on her website. Since they already exist so it's just a matter of posting, maybe you can ask her to send them to you or to tell you where they are located the way everyone else you contacted did? |
Maybe I should jump in on this… ya think.
Nonie, any photos I post on my forums will never come with permission to anyone to re-post on other forums… for the same reason I will not post anyone’s photos that they placed on our forums for training purpose etc.
I’ve been so caught up in several different projects I have not taken the time to even take pics for my photo page… http://www.flexeffect.com/debpic.htm My goal has always been to post photos no later than every 3 years. Last photos were taken at age 62 (with video) I turned 65 (5 months ago). I have at least 7 more months to go before my 3 years are up. And besides.. my photos will be a full year of being 65, not just turning 65. This is even better for those wanting the most out of the time frame. So please be patient
BTW Nonie, I never said I was going to do a VIDEO of me without make-up, that would be way more work than necessary. I said I would do “No Make-up Close-ups” So... hang in there everyone...they're coming I promise  |
I stand corrected w/r/t the close-up without makeup being a photo not video.
Deb Crowley, point taken about not wanting someone else to post your forum photos here without your permission--although it wouldn't have to be without your permission since asking your permission is not that difficult to do.
Anyway, since you are now here and you do have photos that TheresaMary says you recently posted on your forum, is there any reason you yourself couldn't post those here now? I understand the photos for your website need planning so may take a while to be added, but surely even a phone photo would suffice for this purpose--heck, I myself have posted impromptu photos directly from my phone that I took in the middle of posting in order to show something I was talking about--after all, I have nothing to hide.
So considering you already have photos available that you recently posted on your forum, can't you repost them here and now? It seems you do find time to read and post messages on this forum so surely you can spare a moment from your busy schedule to paste a photo URL, can't you?
(BTW, in 7 months you will be 66, which means by then you will have missed the "no later than 3 years" boat; so now would be about the right time for your updated pics to go up on your before/after page--if you are to keep to your schedule, that is.) |
You kinda remind me of my grandkids when they want to open their Xmas gifts early and you have to keep telling them NO… they can get really creative with reasons why they should.
Seriously Nonie… I know you mean well, but not right now ok? |
_________________ Founder of FlexEffect Facialbuilding. My Photo Journal: FlexEffect.com/deb-photos |
|
|
|
  |
Mon Aug 26, 2013 7:52 pm |
SisterS and Fawnie
Thank you so much, your compliments made my day... Hugging you. |
_________________ Founder of FlexEffect Facialbuilding. My Photo Journal: FlexEffect.com/deb-photos |
|
|
|
 |
Tue Aug 27, 2013 8:00 am |
| All due respect, but in light of all that Deb has been thru lately, what about cutting her some slack? |
_________________ ✪ My go-to products: MyFawnie.BigCartel.com ✪ |
|
|
|
  |
Tue Aug 27, 2013 8:33 am |
| fawnie wrote: |
| All due respect, but in light of all that Deb has been thru lately, what about cutting her some slack? |
Agreed. |
_________________ No longer answering PM's due to numerous weird messages. |
|
|
|
 |
Wed Aug 28, 2013 8:29 pm |
| aprile wrote: |
Very nice photos of Elaine Bartlett.... She does look young for her age, but as she states...not 25 again, just a better version of herself. Jeez I didn't even know about her program. I guess -- so many programs, so little time. FWIW, I admire all of the facial exercise gurus!! It's so nice to see that all of these lovely women are continuing to grow older with grace and beauty. And Deb, glad you are feeling so much better and you are certainly on the path to vibrant health with all of the new supplement recommendations you mentioned on the other thread. The body can certainly heal itself... I'm onto that. (I gotta get my K2!!!) {{{Hugs to you}}} Aprile |
You are so right Aprile. These women are role models of natural health. I was thinking the same thing about Elaine. Makes me want to buy her program too. I didn't see Debs supplement recs - I can guess! but will go find them anyway.
Aren't we all fortunate to have these women as role models; and Nonie - thank you for being so fervent for the good of the order. I appreciate you for bringing up great points and helping us to learn.  |
_________________ Enjoying dermalogica with my ASG and Pico toner ** Disclosure: I was a participant without remuneration in promotional videos for Ageless Secret Gold and the Neurotris Pico Emmy event. |
|
jrp0610
New Member
 
Joined: 02 Sep 2013
Posts: 1
|
|
 |
Tue Sep 03, 2013 8:04 am |
" Indeed "It takes Diff'rent Strokes to move the world!"
It sure does my friend!!!....All the best of luck to you and that pretty face of yours.....JP |
|
|
|
|
 |
Wed Sep 04, 2013 1:40 pm |
Nonie wrote
| Quote: |
| but I also tried to stay in touch with Deb to make sure I was really supposed to be that aggressive. |
Nonie, when are you going to give it a rest. You NEVER spoke to me or got in-touch with me regarding training EVER.. or does the word 'tired' get you off the hook?
All these years and you still chose NOT to tell me who you are so that I and everybody else can KNOW you actually bought my program.
While you were on my forum causing trouble I asked you back then several times "Who are you" just so I could believe you were truly a Flexer. You said "you didn't owe me anything" Yet you continue to say "you were begging for my help"
The very fact that you still have on Carolyn's website (Nonie’s Story) saying you didn't know who Carolyn was at the time your face was being destroyed by FlexEffect Girl, you gotta know I still have the PMs proving you wrote to others while you were on the Flex forum recommending Carolyn’s program
Come-on you surely remember the EDS thread that was deleted when all hell broke out that had all that information on it.
Nonie, don't think there aren’t those on this forum who don't know the real truth...just because they don't feel comfortable stepping-up to call you out. They too know how simple it would be for you to prove me wrong.. yet still nothing... You just continue your BS
And BTW... Carolyn also KNOWS you knew her while you were on my forum... yet she also puts up that BS ... Real Admirable.
Below is part of the story you and Carolyn came up with on Carolyn’s site
“But after a year, my face was still a sad story. Although it didn't feel "swollen" anymore, the rolls under my eyes were still there and they were very lined. I would look at photos of my eyes from June/July 2005 when I had no lines and no puffing under my eyes when I smiled, and tears would just well up inside. Needless to say, I was very insecure/unsure about trying another new program and thought I would just go back to the isometrics that had never let me down. But by some very unusual circumstances, I found out about Carolyn's Facial Fitness and was very intrigued by her program. I liked the idea that she developed her program after reviewing many programs out there and creatively came up with her own program - saving us the trouble.”
Link to page site http://www.carolynsfacialfitness.com/nonie
Nonie I have to say… you are right; there is a HUGE difference between your BEFORE photo and your AFTER photo HIDDEN way down at the bottom of the page. Amazing progress in just 8 months GOOD JOB! But I got to be honest… I think you look far younger in your before pic… just sayin.
So let me cut to the chase... You and Carolyn made up the entire BS together. You came into my forum via Carolyn when Carolyn was PO'd over a fight she and some of my trainers were having. You have used this story for years now...whenever and wherever you get the chance.
Carolyn I know you are reading this... copy and paste it ...Your husband is an attorney... BRING IT!
[moderated] |
_________________ Founder of FlexEffect Facialbuilding. My Photo Journal: FlexEffect.com/deb-photos |
|
|
|
 |
Wed Sep 04, 2013 2:03 pm |
Good heavens. Over the top much, Deb? That I can see, Nonie's remarks were nothing to flip over.
This is the kind of stuff that really turns me off about forums. I reported Deb Crowley's last post. Let's hope the unfounded insinuations (Nonie is a troll or is Carolyn, etc.) and name-calling are done.
There is a difference between telling your story (for example, saying that you can't get in touch with a certain vendor) and making unfounded accusations (a member is a troll or not who she claims to be). I think we all know the difference.
Deb, no offense. I've got the last two editions of your program and you've given me good customer service in the past. But this type of thing doesn't contribute anything positive to the dynamics here, and many of us just don't like the drama. PM or email is a better venue for this type of screed. |
|
|
|
|
 |
Wed Sep 04, 2013 2:13 pm |
Ewww ! Deb, won't you relax ? I can't understand how you can write such a virulent post after John Perry was such a gentleman towards Nonie,and after he gave such a nice testimony of his excellent experience following the FlexEffect program.
Instead of basking in his praises, you attack Nonie !!! And Carolyn who has her own face exercising program, calling them both names.
Bring on the attorney ? Surely you jest. |
|
|
|
|
  |
Wed Sep 04, 2013 2:23 pm |
@Yubs, perhaps you should just let Deb have her say, and not swoop in to be the thread police all the time..Seriously!
You obviously are unaware of the back handed tormenting Nonie inflicts on Deb and her program, every chance she gets..
Anyhoo, Deb is always a lady, and I'm happy to see her finally have her say. |
_________________ ♥I'm flattered by all the lovely PM's, but I don't get here much these days. Please don't be afraid to post your quearies to other DIY members who will be glad to help you (or sell you their wares..lol) Still happy with LED, dermarolling and a DIY antioxidant regime. Peace & Hugs to all.♥ |
|
|
|
 |
Wed Sep 04, 2013 2:29 pm |
| I agree with Kassy. And I am still surprised that there are no other stories of people having the same trouble from Flex Effect. If it's a flaw in the program, others should have the same trouble and it would have popped up here in one of the many facial exercise threads over the years. |
|
|
|
|
 |
Wed Sep 04, 2013 2:42 pm |
| Kassy_A wrote: |
@Yubs, perhaps you should just let Deb have her say, and not swoop in to be the thread police all the time..Seriously!
You obviously are unaware of the back handed tormenting Nonie inflicts on Deb and her program, every chance she gets..
Anyhoo, Deb is always a lady, and I'm happy to see her finally have her say. |
Hmmm. Seems like people don't like it when others are called on dumb high school dynamics on a woman's forum. And that's exactly what stuff like this is: adolescent bickering.
Is it even possible for women to get together and not act like this? I'm beginning to wonder. Seriously. There's a guy's forum I go on where they don't act like this, and it's pretty pleasant. I wish they had the information about skincare there I needed. I feel compelled to read everything here because you never know where a valuable nugget of information is going to pop-up...even in threads that you don't have much interest in or that make you grit your teeth. Sometimes my OCD just gets the better of my good judgment, and then posts like this happen.
Soooo...anyways, sorry if you don't like my comments, Kassy. But please note that I don't attack the poster, only the tone or content of certain remarks, even if people seem to take it generally personally.
We all get snarky and backhanded sometimes. That is not my issue. My issue is with constant insults (oblique or outright), unfounded accusations that may be self-evident or proven to a few but are NOT to the vast majority of forum users, and name-calling.
The great thing about forums is that everyone has a say, and this is mine. Further, I'm not the only one that thinks these things, I'm just the only one ill-advised enough to say them out loud. Others don't really seem to want to get ostracized by the "big time posters" here, who are in large measure responsible for these dynamics, but I do get PM's here and there about it. Bottom line is I get tired of the stuff like this that keeps happening. It makes the forum a less pleasant place to be on, and it's so very high school.
It will be interesting to see how many thank you's your post racks up, though.
| Lotusesther wrote: |
| I agree with Kassy. And I am still surprised that there are no other stories of people having the same trouble from Flex Effect. If it's a flaw in the program, others should have the same trouble and it would have popped up here in one of the many facial exercise threads over the years. |
Lotusesther, I do not like FlexEffect, either. It made me look tired and stressed in a very short amount of time. However, I was not a distressed about it as Nonie apparently is, because I didn't spend years looking good on another program. But I HAVE heard of other bad stories about Flex Effect and even recall reading some here back in the day when it was all the chatter.
What I do observe is that while there aren't many "horror stories" like Nonie's, many former FE enthusiasts are not as enthusiastic, either.
At any rate, this is not about the ongoing feud between Deb and Nonie. It's about Deb making unfounded insinuations and calling names. In whose book does that make one a lady, exactly?
Let the pile-on begin. I am the devil with a keyboard, no?
Peace out, y'all. |
|
|
|
|
 |
Wed Sep 04, 2013 3:03 pm |
Yes, if the quote from Nonie was the reason to go off...You're right... over kill. But, I know you guys have been around long enough to know what this is about.
Those of you new to this forum I apologize...
Under Nonie's newest 2013 photo on Carolyn's site reads:
Dear Carolyn: As you know, before I started your program in Jan 2007,my previous years of face exercises had been virtually undone, in just over a year prior,by another face exercise program.
Isn't a great photo enough with praise given to Carolyn... why again same BS
Really, again. Every opportunity. If the post is not for the public to know who she is talking about than definitely for me to know.
Here is how it goes on all the other forums she is on....Oh Nonie... please tell us, who's program did that to you.
It is now 2013...it started in 2005 so 8 years is still not enough Really? If it were the truth (she trained with my program and she had a problem with it or at least she believed it) I would have nothing to say. But not for a lie.
But you are right. This isn't the place to unload. I'll find a better place |
_________________ Founder of FlexEffect Facialbuilding. My Photo Journal: FlexEffect.com/deb-photos |
|
|
|
 |
Wed Sep 04, 2013 3:13 pm |
| bethany wrote: |
I see the word "unfounded" being used a lot, which means "having no foundation or basis in fact."
Wouldn't someone need to be familiar with all the details in order to make such a definitive statement? |
Unfounded does mean no basis in facts. But allegations and dark hints that facts are known to some but can't be disclosed to all *do not count* as facts. Occam's Razor aside, theorizing the reasons behind and connections between seemingly related events (i.e., coincidences) *does not* count as fact, either.
Just because you can make a connection in your mind to Events A and B does not mean that C is the only conclusion possible. Often it is, but I've experienced it NOT to be so enough in my life that I'm no longer willing to believe dark hints and insinuations. Especially when someone's reputation is on the line, I'd like to see a little more proof that A + B = C.
Therefore, AFAIC, any accusations made that are not proven by publicly disclosed facts are de facto"unfounded". At least, until facts are disclosed. Until then, they're just unfounded insinuation and allegations. |
|
|
|
|
 |
Wed Sep 04, 2013 4:05 pm |
Sheesh gotta add my two cents, I've seen Nonie's B&A photos, and honestly I don't see what the "beef" is or was. It's not like she turned into the Elephant Man or something using Flex Effect. In fact, I think Nonie looks great in ALL her photos -- Befores and Afters. Suffice it to say, it's her face so she's certainly entitled to her opinion. But, I have to agree at every corner and on every thread where there's an opportunity awaiting, something WILL BE posted about her perceived bad experience, photos included. So can't say that I blame ya in the least Deb...it's been a looooong time comein'.  |
|
|
|
|
 |
Thu Sep 05, 2013 12:23 am |
| Deb Crowley wrote: |
Nonie wrote
| Quote: |
| but I also tried to stay in touch with Deb to make sure I was really supposed to be that aggressive. |
Nonie, when are you going to give it a rest. You NEVER spoke to me or got in-touch with me regarding training EVER.. or does the word 'tired' get you off the hook?
All these years and you still chose NOT to tell me who you are so that I and everybody else can KNOW you actually bought my program.
While you were on my forum causing trouble I asked you back then several times "Who are you" just so I could believe you were truly a Flexer. You said "you didn't owe me anything" Yet you continue to say "you were begging for my help"
The very fact that you still have on Carolyn's website (Nonie’s Story) saying you didn't know who Carolyn was at the time your face was being destroyed by FlexEffect Girl, you gotta know I still have the PMs proving you wrote to others while you were on the Flex forum recommending Carolyn’s program
Come-on you surely remember the EDS thread that was deleted when all hell broke out that had all that information on it.
Nonie, don't think there aren’t those on this forum who don't know the real truth...just because they don't feel comfortable stepping-up to call you out. They too know how simple it would be for you to prove me wrong.. yet still nothing... You just continue your BS
And BTW... Carolyn also KNOWS you knew her while you were on my forum... yet she also puts up that BS ... Real Admirable.
Below is part of the story you and Carolyn came up with on Carolyn’s site
“But after a year, my face was still a sad story. Although it didn't feel "swollen" anymore, the rolls under my eyes were still there and they were very lined. I would look at photos of my eyes from June/July 2005 when I had no lines and no puffing under my eyes when I smiled, and tears would just well up inside. Needless to say, I was very insecure/unsure about trying another new program and thought I would just go back to the isometrics that had never let me down. But by some very unusual circumstances, I found out about Carolyn's Facial Fitness and was very intrigued by her program. I liked the idea that she developed her program after reviewing many programs out there and creatively came up with her own program - saving us the trouble.”
Link to page site http://www.carolynsfacialfitness.com/nonie
Nonie I have to say… you are right; there is a HUGE difference between your BEFORE photo and your AFTER photo HIDDEN way down at the bottom of the page. Amazing progress in just 8 months GOOD JOB! But I got to be honest… I think you look far younger in your before pic… just sayin.
So let me cut to the chase... You and Carolyn made up the entire BS together. You came into my forum via Carolyn when Carolyn was PO'd over a fight she and some of my trainers were having. You have used this story for years now...whenever and wherever you get the chance.
Carolyn I know you are reading this... copy and paste it ...Your husband is an attorney... BRING IT! |
| Deb Crowley wrote: |
Yes, if the quote from Nonie was the reason to go off...You're right... over kill. But, I know you guys have been around long enough to know what this is about.
Those of you new to this forum I apologize...
Under Nonie's newest 2013 photo on Carolyn's site reads:
Dear Carolyn: As you know, before I started your program in Jan 2007,my previous years of face exercises had been virtually undone, in just over a year prior,by another face exercise program.
Isn't a great photo enough with praise given to Carolyn... why again same BS
Really, again. Every opportunity. If the post is not for the public to know who she is talking about than definitely for me to know.
Here is how it goes on all the other forums she is on....Oh Nonie... please tell us, who's program did that to you.
It is now 2013...it started in 2005 so 8 years is still not enough Really? If it were the truth (she trained with my program and she had a problem with it or at least she believed it) I would have nothing to say. But not for a lie.
But you are right. This isn't the place to unload. I'll find a better place |
-I did try to contact you many times via email, phone and even PM, but all in vain. I even reached out to Marci Frank since all you online trainers were MIA from October 2005 when I joined the forum to March 2006 when I was banned. If anyone thinks I'm lying, they can look at your posts and they will see you had a post on Sept 16, 2005 where you were responding to a Lois then your next post after that was on March 7, 2006 when you came to tell us PC was going to be a moderator and that you can't be on the computer as much as you'd like.
-Deb, you never asked me anything while I was on your forum because you never communicated with me even once between October 2005 and March 2006 which was the time I was on your forum. In fact, IIRC Sept 28, 2005 was the last time any of the trainers (Jason, you or Olympia) ever posted. I remember that date because I even asked Marci if there was anything special about that date. I actually joined the forum because you didn't return my calls or emails, in the hopes of reaching you that way. I had noticed that in September while you were ignoring my VM messages and emails, you were active on the forum so I joined to send you PMs which you never answered. If you had been in touch at all, trust me, I would not have been contacting Marci who wasn't even an online trainer after my many failed attempts to reach any of you online trainers to get help. She relayed my message to you in person that we needed you on the forum. Still it wasn't enough to make you care enough to come help us. Why would I lie about this or anything to do with my experience with FE? What do I have to gain?
- It is not true that you asked who I was in the time I was on the forum because as I stated above, we never interacted in that time at all. Did you forget that you were absent from the FE forum all that time I was there? So how could you have asked me anything? You asked who I was over 5 years AFTER I left FE and while I was actually a member of EDS circa 2011. You initially sent your messengers to ask me here on EDS before you asked me yourself and it was then that I told you through them that I owed you nothing and I still maintain I owe you jack. (Actually unless you use another persona on the forum, I have never told you directly that I owe you nothing. This is the first time I am telling YOU directly.) Back when I needed you, you wouldn't have had to ask for anything and I'd have given anything to get your help. Now I don't need you and I am not obligated to give you anything. So quit asking me for anything. I'm not in the habit of giving people who treat me horribly things. What's more, isn't it ironic how you can claim with such emphasis that I never contacted you then in the same breath ask who I am because you don't even remember me? Or can't you keep your story straight? Also didn't you once post here on EDS--a post that was deleted after your false accusations were exposed--that Carolyn called you crying about her face twice? A case of mistaken identity perhaps? Clearly you do remember my calls or you would not have given such a clear account regarding someone else if it never happened. After all, I was indeed in tears in my second and last call to get through to you because I was upset about my eyes looking horrible when I had followed your direction. Now in 2006, you were convinced that Agedefyer (my name then hence the AD in my name now) was Carolyn Cleaves, or so you told people. So could it be that you are still mixing us up? It was during my call to you when I was crying that you told me about the "awkward stage" that I have to go through and assured me that your eyes too went through that before you came out looking as you do in that photo with the blue background that was on the kit materials. You also told me I had to "work harder" to get past that awkward stage. The call I made to you before that was to ask you if I was supposed to be as aggressive pulling down on my eyes as your DVD showed and you assured me yes, it was the way to get results. I was not crying during that first call as I had only watched your DVD and was yet to start your program so my face still looked fine.
- I never caused problems on your forum. I did what I do here, which is give advice. In fact it wasn't until a newbie called doozie showed up on March 4, 2006 and got a negative reaction after mentioning having seen you and I explained to her on the forum why everyone was mad with you that you can actually accuse me of stating anything negative about you Deborah Crowley publicly on your forum. But it was after others beat me to the punch and expressed annoyance at your absence on the forum. In fact, back when this was posted, the FE Forum wasn't locked as it is now so anyone who had Internet access could view the thread before it got deleted. Lucky for me, I saved it exactly as it appeared. It took that March 2006 uproar in that thread to bring you on-board to post the very first post since you last posted in Sept 2005, which is the post of March 7, 2006 I mentioned above.
- Nowhere on the CFF website have I stated that I didn't know of Carolyn's program when FE was messing my face up, so please do not put words into my "mouth". I just didn't spell out what the "very unusual circumstances" by which I found Carolyn were so whatever inference you made sounds like you got the wrong end of the stick. Really, you lost me on what in that statement says I did not know of Carolyn when I was struggling with FE. It is a fact that I didn't commit to Carolyn's Facial Fitness program until 2007 even though I knew of it before that. Just like I bought your program in winter 2005 but didn't start to do it till July 2005. BTW, I also have a lot of other programs that I own but don't do but enjoyed reading through or watching when I got them. I think this is something a lot of people into hobbies of any kind do: look into different things related to their hobby. But I do like to commit to just one program at a time. (Well, I'm doing Tom Hagerty's too so I guess I am committing to two at the moment).
- Yes it is 2013 and my FE experience was in 2005. But what has that got to do with price of eggs? My experience with Eva started in 1990 and is no more but guess what, I still talk about Eva even though it was before FE. Heck I even go as far as talking about myself back when I was a baby 40 years ago. So because it is my life, it is my prerogative to tell about it whatever I want to. Hence I will not avoid talking about my experience with FE if the discussion warrants it because my FE experience is part of my face exercise journey. Unlike most people who have only been able to either have bad experiences or have good experiences with face exercises, I am lucky in that I can give a testament of not just the good side of face exercises but I can also validate those who say face exercises make faces worse. I have not only witnessed face exercise keeping wrinkles at bay firsthand but I have witnessed them create wrinkles firsthand and then I have also witnessed them remove wrinkles if you have them firsthand. My experience with these facets of face exercises puts me in a position where I can actually speak with confidence from experience. I have told people that it is safe to start face exercises when young to keep wrinkles at bay, so if I don't talk about FE, then my previous statement sounds like a lie because it is indeed a fact that down the road I did develop wrinkles and need to fix them even though I did start face exercises to keep wrinkles at bay. To just talk about Eva's program without talking about FE would seem to imply that Eva's program eventually gives one wrinkles and puffy eyes. But that was not my experience. How can I talk of keeping signs of aging at bay with exercise and then not explain why I needed to fix signs of aging that I claim face exercises prevent? People post about having bad experiences with different programs all the time. So I don't know what makes FE apparently out of bounds.
- Never did I recommend CFF to anyone on the FE forum. Not even in PMs. I did recommend Eva's program because I knew what it was capable of. I didn't know what CFF could do and didn't know enough about it to recommend it to anyone. I did tell someone that I was trying out a forehead exercise from CFF in a PM which is the only PM you have ever been able to post as proof when you were telling everyone that I "was Carolyn" on your forum trying to promote "my program". I never told anyone to do her program. I was sharing what I was trying out. But I did tell people in no uncertain terms in PM that I think Eva's program is better for young faces because I started to believe that when my own face started to look bad. I even posted this sentiment on your forum and have maintained that stand even on this forum: That I don't think facebuilding is for people who have not lost mass in their face. Why would they need to BUILD on a face that is already full?
- I do not "come up with any story together with Carolyn". Unlike you who feeds people who didn't know me with untruths so they can attack me on forums, I work alone. Carolyn doesn't have any control on what I write. I have a mind of my own, thank you very much. I am very happy with her program and so I write to her what I want her to post and I share my positive experience here too. I also had a very good experience with Eva's program and have had a good experience with Tom's so I sing their praises here too. My stating on my latest review of CFF that it was as if I had never done face exercises because of what FE did is actually accurate because everyone who sees my face at 36 post-FE actually says I looked my age. In other words, I looked like what a regular 36-year old who lives a healthy lifestyle looks like--that is, one who has not done face exercises for 15 years to maintain her 20-something face. A few months before FE, I used to be told I looked like a 20-something, thanks to Eva's Facial Fitness program. Point being that FE totally put me at the same starting point as someone who had never done face exercises. And why is this important? Why mention it? Because it does give hope to those who start face exercises at 37 without ever having done them before. But the fact that I do have a history of face exercises way before that is important because it also explains the fast turn around of my face. To leave any of that information out would be misleading as it would have people expecting the same quick results in such a short time. By putting everything on the table folks can assess my photos accurately.
- Anyway, I have no problems posting proof, but the last time I did, it was taken down. So if Havana8 gives me the OK to post proof, then I will be happy to present it for everyone's review. I don't ever say or post anything I cannot back up. If Havana8 does not give me the OK to post proof, then I have said all I need to say on this matter. Besides, this thread is supposed to celebrate face exercise founders and show off their progress, which is what I have tried to do and encourage so can we please return to the topic at hand? |
|
|
|
|
 |
Thu Sep 05, 2013 5:34 am |
| aprile wrote: |
TM - These are very good comments, and honestly could be applicable to several threads on this forum. Bashing a business is bashing a business in my book. When a person comes on a forum and makes comments about FE ruining their face, or a microcurrent device causing a seizure, or even intimating that a product's founder is unethical, these ARE detrimental to those businesses. Further, when these comments are not backed up by absolute proof and are written in such a slanderous way as we've all seen many times on EDS, it's nothing short of defamation of character. To me, it just stands to reason that people should leave *personal* out of the equation when they don't like a certain product or device, and at some point they need to "LET IT GO AND MOVE ON!" If you want to post something nice and share how it worked for, then go for it...otherwise, IMO to continue on in this fashion on this thread or others, it's just beating a dead horse. ~ Aprile  |
So you're saying that no negative reviews should be posted? Do you really mean that if you used a topical and it gave you an adverse reaction, or you used a device which caused you a physical injury, that it shouldn't be mentioned? Do you believe that Cookie did the wrong thing by posting her experience with the DermaJet? Do you believe that she should be sued or accused of defamation?
These types of forums are the easiest way to get feedback on products - if you're going to start insisting people only post positive reviews what use is that to anybody. And anyone in business should be prepared to deal with unsatisfied customers and negative feedback.
Why don't people just let other people have their say - let the combatants battle it out - as long as they do so in a civil manner. |
_________________ Born 1950. There's a new cream on the market that gets rid of wrinkles - you smear it on the mirror!! |
|
|
|
 |
Thu Sep 05, 2013 6:57 am |
Keliu - I don’t think anyone is saying negative reviews shouldn’t be posted, but its what is said in the reviews that has the capacity to do harm that needs to be considered here. As we all know Nonie purchased it ages ago – when the forum etc was a much different place, but sometimes when you read her posts you would think it was yesterday. Also we are constantly bombarded with how she “spoke” to Deb, and Deb has asked her several times to let her know who she was (which speaks volumes to me). It also strikes me as strange why she won’t just say privately to Deb, “I’m so and so and I purchased it here on this date”. Deb has even said she’d publicly apologise if she did that, but to no avail. Anytime any posts about FlexEffect, its almost like the past is dug up again and again and its done with what I think is a deliberate intent to harm Deb and her business and put off new customers. Whislt I agree your right people should have their say, its not to say that they should be allowed to completely misrepresent the truth or individuals who were involved, nor should they not expect to get asked questions about what happened too. After all, sometimes we only get partial parts of what happened, and I myself have experienced this on the forum and regretted it many times thereafter.
John Perry – please don’t let this put you off. There is a long history that sadly you have walked into the middle of here, but we’re glad to have you and its great that you shared your experience. We definitely need more men, at the moment there’s only a few here. |
|
|
|
|
| Fri Oct 31, 2025 11:20 pm |
If this is your first visit to the EDS Forums please take the time to register. Registration is required for you to post on the forums. Registration will also give you the ability to track messages of interest, send private messages to other users, participate in Gift Certificates draws and enjoy automatic discounts for shopping at our online store. Registration is free and takes just a few seconds to complete.
Click Here to join our community.
If you are already a registered member on the forums, please login to gain full access to the site. |
|
 |
 |
|